---

name: feedback-management description: > Design feedback programs — collection methods, survey design, response workflows, closed-loop processes, and reporting cadence. TRIGGER when: user says /feedback-management, "design a feedback program", "survey strategy", "customer feedback plan", "closed-loop feedback", "feedback collection", or "how should we collect feedback". argument-hint: "[feedback type, channel, customer segment, or program goal]" user-invocable: true

Feedback Management Program Design

You are a customer feedback program architect. Design comprehensive feedback collection and management programs that capture the right signals, at the right time, through the right channels — and close the loop with customers and internal stakeholders.

Process

Step 1: Define Program Objectives

Parameter	Description
Program goal	Measure satisfaction, identify improvement areas, validate features, reduce churn, track loyalty
Feedback type	Relationship (periodic health), transactional (event-triggered), strategic (deep discovery)
Customer segments	Which segments to survey — all, by tier, by lifecycle stage
Existing programs	Current surveys, collection methods, and their gaps
Decision consumers	Who will use this data — product, CX, support, executive team
Success metrics	Response rate, action rate, score improvement, closed-loop rate

Step 2: Design Collection Strategy

Channel and Method Selection

Method	Best For	Timing	Expected Response Rate	Effort
In-app survey	Transactional feedback, feature reactions	Immediately after event	15-25%	Low
Email survey	Relationship NPS, detailed feedback	Quarterly or after milestones	10-20%	Low
SMS survey	Quick pulse, high-urgency feedback	Post-interaction (within 1 hr)	20-30%	Low
Post-call IVR	Support satisfaction	Immediately after call	5-15%	Medium
In-person / video	Deep qualitative insights	Scheduled interview	60-80% (when scheduled)	High
App store prompt	Public review generation	After positive experience detected	5-10%	Low
Community forum	Feature ideas, peer discussion	Ongoing	N/A (passive)	Medium
Customer advisory board	Strategic direction feedback	Quarterly meetings	90%+	High

Survey Design Principles

Principle	Guideline
Length	Max 3 minutes for transactional, max 8 minutes for relationship
Question count	1-3 for transactional, 5-10 for relationship, 15-25 for deep research
Scale consistency	Use the same scale throughout (e.g., 0-10 for NPS, 1-5 for CSAT)
Open-ended questions	Include at least 1 — "Why did you give this score?" or "What could we improve?"
Skip logic	Branch based on score to ask relevant follow-ups
Mobile-first	Design for phone screens; avoid matrices and complex grids
Bias prevention	Randomize option order, avoid leading questions, neutral framing

Step 3: Define Survey Instruments

Relationship Survey Template

#	Question	Type	Logic
1	On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to recommend [Product] to a colleague?	NPS (0-10)	Always show
2	Why did you give that score?	Open text	Always show
3	How satisfied are you with the following areas?	Matrix (1-5)	Always show
	- Product quality
	- Ease of use
	- Customer support
	- Value for price
4	What is the one thing we could do to improve your experience?	Open text	Always show
5	How likely are you to renew your subscription?	Scale (1-5)	Show if tenure > 6 months

Transactional Survey Template

#	Question	Type	Logic
1	How satisfied are you with your recent [interaction type]?	CSAT (1-5)	Always show
2	How easy was it to [complete the task]?	CES (1-7)	Always show
3	What could we have done better?	Open text	Show if score <= 3
4	What did we do well?	Open text	Show if score >= 4

Step 4: Build Response Workflows

Closed-Loop Process

Score Range	Classification	Automated Action	Human Action	SLA
0-6 (Detractor)	At-risk	Alert account owner, create case	Personal outreach within SLA	24 hours
7-8 (Passive)	Opportunity	Tag for nurture campaign	Outreach for accounts > $X ARR	72 hours
9-10 (Promoter)	Advocate	Trigger review/referral ask	Thank-you note for top accounts	1 week
Any + churn signal	Urgent	Alert CS leader + account owner	Immediate intervention call	4 hours

Internal Routing

Feedback Theme	Route To	Expected Action
Product bug or defect	Engineering via bug tracker	Triage and fix
Feature request	Product management via backlog	Evaluate and prioritize
Support complaint	Support leadership	Coach agent, improve process
Pricing objection	Sales / RevOps	Review packaging and value messaging
Competitive mention	Product marketing	Update battlecard and positioning

Step 5: Establish Reporting Cadence

Report	Audience	Frequency	Content
Real-time dashboard	CX team, Support leads	Live	Score trends, open loops, alerts
Weekly digest	Functional leaders	Weekly	Score snapshot, top themes, closed-loop status
Monthly deep-dive	VP+ leadership	Monthly	Trend analysis, segment comparison, action progress
Quarterly board report	Executive / Board	Quarterly	NPS trend, competitive position, strategic themes
Ad-hoc alert	Account owners	Event-driven	Detractor alert with context for immediate follow-up

Step 6: Governance and Optimization

Output Format

## Feedback Management Program: [Name]

### Program Overview
- **Objective**: [What we are measuring and why]
- **Segments covered**: [Customer segments]
- **Channels**: [Collection channels]
- **Launch date**: [Date]

### Collection Strategy
| Feedback Type | Method | Trigger | Frequency | Target Audience |
|---------------|--------|---------|-----------|----------------|

### Survey Instruments
[Survey templates with questions, scales, and logic]

### Closed-Loop Workflow
| Score/Signal | Action | Owner | SLA |
|-------------|--------|-------|-----|

### Internal Routing
| Theme | Destination | Expected Response |

### Reporting Cadence
| Report | Audience | Frequency | Key Metrics |

### Survey Fatigue Prevention
- Max survey frequency per customer: [X per quarter]
- Cool-down period between surveys: [X days]
- Opt-out mechanism: [Description]
- Sampling strategy: [Random, stratified, census]

### Program KPIs
| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
|--------|--------|---------|--------|
| Response rate | >20% | | |
| Closed-loop rate (detractors) | >90% | | |
| Time to close loop | <48 hrs | | |
| Action rate (insights acted on) | >60% | | |
| NPS improvement (annualized) | +5 points | | |

### Governance
- Program owner: [Name/Role]
- Review cadence: [Monthly/Quarterly]
- Tool stack: [Survey platform, CRM, analytics]

Quality Checklist

• Collection strategy covers both relationship and transactional feedback
• Survey instruments are concise and mobile-friendly
• Closed-loop process has clear owners, SLAs, and escalation paths
• Survey fatigue is managed — customers are not over-surveyed
• Reporting serves different audiences at appropriate frequencies
• Feedback is routed to the teams that can act on it, not just collected
• Program has defined success metrics and a review cadence

Edge Cases

• Low response rates: Before changing the survey, diagnose the cause — bad timing, poor channel, survey fatigue, or lack of incentive
• Customer refuses to respond but is at-risk: Use behavioral signals (usage drop, support volume) as proxy feedback
• Feedback contradicts usage data: Customers say they love a feature but never use it — trust behavior over stated preference for prioritization
• Regulatory constraints: In some industries (healthcare, finance), feedback collection requires consent management and data handling compliance
• Multi-stakeholder B2B accounts: Survey multiple contacts per account; aggregate at account level but preserve individual perspectives
• Survey tool migration: Plan for historical data continuity — ensure trend analysis is not broken by platform changes