---

name: mutation-testing description: "EXPERIMENTAL — mutation testing with muter to measure whether tests actually assert anything: mutants that survive reveal assertion-free coverage. Advisory report only, never a merge gate. Use on engine/logic targets when coverage numbers look good but bugs still slip through." allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash] last_verified: 2026-07-24 review_by: 2027-07-01

Mutation Testing (Experimental)

Status: EXPERIMENTAL — advisory report only. Never wire this as a merge gate.

Coverage proves a line ran under test; mutation testing proves a test would notice if the line were wrong. Muter mutates the source (flips > to <, && to ||, deletes statements), reruns the suite per mutant, and reports the mutants that survived — code that is covered but effectively unasserted. It is the truest answer to "did the agent write real tests or coverage theater," and also the slowest and most fragile tool in the gauntlet, which is why it stays advisory.

When This Skill Activates

Use this skill when:

• Coverage is healthy but bugs still slip through covered code
• Auditing agent-written test suites for assertion-free tests
• A periodic (nightly/weekly) quality audit of engine/logic targets

Do NOT use as a per-commit or merge-blocking check — a full mutation run multiplies the suite's runtime by the mutant count.

Setup

1. Install muter and confirm it runs against the current Xcode before investing further:

brew install muter-mutation-testing/formulae/muter
muter --version

2. Copy templates/muter.conf.yml to the repo root as muter.conf.yml and scope it (see below).
3. First run:

muter run    # writes an HTML/console report of surviving mutants

Scoping: Engines Only

Mutation-test the code where logic density is highest and the suite claims real coverage — engine/store/service types. Exclude UI, generated code, and test files: mutating a SwiftUI body mostly produces noise, and every excluded file cuts the runtime multiplier.

mutateSourcesInDirectories:
  - App/Engines
  - App/Stores
excludeList:
  - "*View.swift"
  - "*Preview*"

Reading the Report

• Killed mutant — a test failed: the suite genuinely asserts this behavior.
• Survived mutant — every test passed with the code broken: coverage without verification. Each survivor is a concrete, located prompt: write the assertion that kills it.
• Mutation score (killed ÷ total) is a trend number for the same scope over time; do not chase an absolute score.

Caveats (Why This Stays Advisory)

• Toolchain fragility: muter rewrites source and drives xcodebuild; new Xcode releases can break it until the project catches up. Always verify a plain muter run completes on the current toolchain before trusting results.
• Swift Testing detection: muter's kill detection matured on XCTest. Verify it detects Swift Testing (#expect) failures in YOUR project: run one mutant cycle on a file whose suite you trust, and confirm survivors/kills match expectations.
• Runtime: suite time × mutants. Scope hard, run nightly or on demand.

Deterministic Fallback: Manual Mutation Spot-Checks

When muter can't run (toolchain break, CI limits), the drill from testing/fitness-functions/ scales down to single mutations by hand:

1. Pick a critical function; invert one condition (or return a constant).
2. Run its suite — a test MUST fail. If nothing fails, the suite has an assertion gap: write the missing test now.
3. Revert. Two or three spot-checks per engine per release is a meaningful audit.

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall	Problem	Solution
Wiring as a merge gate	Runtime + fragility block everyone	Nightly/on-demand advisory report
Mutating the whole app	Hours of UI-noise mutants	Scope to engine/store directories
Chasing a score	Score varies with scope, not quality	Track survivors fixed, not the percentage
Trusting an unverified run	Kill detection may miss the test framework	Calibrate on a suite you trust first

References

• testing/coverage-ratchet/ — the cheap proxy this tool audits
• testing/fitness-functions/ — deliberate-break drill (the manual fallback)
• testing/tdd-feature/ — writing the assertions that kill survivors