인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
문서 및 사무 · SKILL.md

persona-updater

persona-updater

Update user personas from new feedback, pilot data, or research. Use this skill when: - New pilot data or feedback reveals changed user behaviors or pain points - Annual persona review is due (1-2x per year) - New user segments are discovered that need persona documentation - Existing personas need validation against recent data

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: persona-updater description: | Update user personas from new feedback, pilot data, or research. Use this skill when:

  • New pilot data or feedback reveals changed user behaviors or pain points
  • Annual persona review is due (1-2x per year)
  • New user segments are discovered that need persona documentation
  • Existing personas need validation against recent data

Persona Updater

Systematically update user persona files when new data (pilot observations, feedback, research) reveals changes in user behaviors, pain points, goals, or context. Generates diffs and preserves existing persona structure.

When to Use

  • After pilot rounds with new user observations (1-2x per year)
  • After significant feedback collection rounds
  • When expanding to new user segments or geographies
  • During annual persona review cycles

Workflow

  1. Read existing personas — Load all persona files from your persona directory
  2. Read new data sources — Pilot debrief reports, feedback, research
  3. Compare — Identify what's new, changed, or no longer relevant
  4. Generate diff — Structured change list per persona
  5. Propose updates — Show the diff to the user for approval
  6. Apply updates — Edit persona files preserving existing structure

Persona Dimensions to Track

DimensionWhat to Look For
DemographicsAge range, role, geography, segment
GoalsWhat they're trying to achieve
Pain PointsCurrent frustrations and blockers
BehaviorsHow they use the product, daily routines, device usage
ContextEnvironment, connectivity, device type
MotivationsWhat drives engagement
BarriersWhat prevents usage
Mental ModelsHow they think about the domain

Output Format

# Persona Update Report

**Date:** {DD-MM-YYYY}
**Data Sources:** {list sources reviewed}
**Personas Reviewed:** {count}
**Changes Found:** {count}

---

## Persona: {Persona Name} ({file path})

### New Findings

| # | Dimension | Finding | Source | Confidence |
|---|-----------|---------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | Pain Points | {new pain point discovered} | {source} | High/Med/Low |

### Changed Findings

| # | Dimension | Current Text | Proposed Update | Source | Rationale |
|---|-----------|-------------|-----------------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | Goals | "{current}" | "{updated}" | {source} | {why} |

### Removed / No Longer Relevant

| # | Dimension | Current Text | Reason for Removal | Source |
|---|-----------|-------------|-------------------|--------|
| 1 | Pain Points | "{old}" | Resolved by {feature} | {evidence} |

### No Change (Validated)

| # | Dimension | Current Text | Validation Source |
|---|-----------|-------------|------------------|
| 1 | Goals | "{goal}" | Confirmed in pilot |

---

## Summary

| Persona | New | Changed | Removed | Validated | Action |
|---------|-----|---------|---------|-----------|--------|
| {name} | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | Update |

Update Rules

  1. Always generate the diff first — Never edit persona files without showing proposed changes
  2. Preserve existing structure — Match the heading hierarchy and writing style
  3. Mark confidence levels — Single observation is "Low"; data from 50 users is "High"
  4. Don't remove without evidence — Only mark as "no longer relevant" with explicit evidence
  5. Add source citations — Every change must cite where the new data came from
  6. Version the update — Add a note: Last updated: {date} — Source: {data source}
  7. Flag new segments — If data reveals uncovered user segments, flag as new persona candidates

Anti-Patterns

  • Don't update personas without new data — that's just editing, not updating
  • Don't merge multiple personas without evidence they overlap
  • Don't remove pain points just because a fix was shipped — verify the fix worked

Quality Checklist

  • Every change has a data source citation
  • Confidence levels marked on all findings
  • Diff shown to user before applying changes
  • Existing persona structure preserved
  • New segments flagged if discovered
저장한 Skills