인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
문서 및 사무 · SKILL.md

write-incident-runbook

write-incident-runbook

Create structured incident runbooks with diagnostic steps, resolution procedures, escalation paths, and communication templates for effective incident response. Use when documenting response procedures for recurring alerts, standardizing incident response across an on-call rotation, reducing MTTR with clear diagnostic steps, creating training materials for …

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: write-incident-runbook locale: caveman-ultra source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-05-03" description: > Create structured incident runbooks with diagnostic steps, resolution procedures, escalation paths, and communication templates for effective incident response. Use when documenting response procedures for recurring alerts, standardizing incident response across an on-call rotation, reducing MTTR with clear diagnostic steps, creating training materials for new team members, or linking alert annotations directly to resolution procedures. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: observability complexity: basic language: multi tags: runbook, incident-response, diagnostics, escalation, documentation

Write Incident Runbook

Actionable runbooks → guide responders through incident diagnosis + resolution.

Use When

  • Doc response procedures for recurring alerts|incidents
  • Standardize response across on-call rotation
  • Reduce MTTR via clear diagnostic steps
  • Training for new team on incident handling
  • Establish escalation paths + comm protocols
  • Migrate tribal knowledge → written
  • Link alerts → resolution (alert annotations)

In

  • Required: Incident|alert name|desc
  • Required: Historical incident data + resolution patterns
  • Optional: Diagnostic queries (Prometheus, logs, traces)
  • Optional: Escalation contacts + comm channels
  • Optional: Prev incident post-mortems

Do

Step 1: Choose Template

See Extended Examples for complete template files.

Select per incident type + complexity.

Basic runbook template structure:

# [Alert/Incident Name] Runbook
## Overview | Severity | Symptoms
## Diagnostic Steps | Resolution Steps
## Escalation | Communication | Prevention | Related

Advanced SRE template (excerpt):

# [Service Name] - [Incident Type] Runbook

## Metadata
- Service, Owner, Severity, On-Call, Last Updated

## Diagnostic Phase
### Quick Health Check (< 5 min): Dashboard, error rate, deployments
### Detailed Investigation (5-20 min): Metrics, logs, traces, failure patterns
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete template)

Key components:

  • Metadata: Service ownership, severity, on-call rotation
  • Diagnostic Phase: Quick checks → detailed → failure patterns
  • Resolution: Immediate mitigation → root cause fix → verify
  • Escalation: Criteria + contact paths
  • Comm: Internal|external templates
  • Prevention: Short|long-term actions

Got: Template selected matches incident complexity, sections appropriate for service type.

If err:

  • Start basic, iterate per incident patterns
  • Review industry examples (Google SRE books, vendor runbooks)
  • Adapt per team feedback after first use

Step 2: Diagnostic Procedures

See Extended Examples for complete diagnostic queries and decision trees.

Step-by-step investigation w/ specific queries.

6-step checklist:

  1. Verify Service Health: Health endpoint + uptime metrics

    curl -I https://api.example.com/health  # Expected: HTTP 200 OK
    
    up{job="api-service"}  # Expected: 1 for all instances
    
  2. Check Error Rate: Current % + breakdown by endpoint

    sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
    / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) * 100  # Expected: < 1%
    
  3. Analyze Logs: Recent errs + top err msgs from Loki

    {job="api-service"} |= "error" | json | level="error"
    
  4. Resource Util: CPU, memory, conn pool status

    avg(rate(container_cpu_usage_seconds_total{pod=~"api-service.*"}[5m])) * 100
    # Expected: < 70%
    
  5. Recent Changes: Deployments, git commits, infra changes

  6. Dependencies: Downstream service health, DB|API latency

Failure pattern decision tree (excerpt):

  • Service down? → Check all pods|instances
  • Error rate elevated? → Check specific err types (5xx, gateway, DB, timeouts)
  • When started? → After deployment (rollback), gradual (resource leak), sudden (traffic|dep)

Got: Diagnostic procedures specific, expected vs actual vals, guides responder.

If err:

  • Test queries in actual monitoring before doc
  • Screenshots of dashboards for visual ref
  • "Common mistakes" section for missed steps
  • Iterate per responder feedback

Step 3: Resolution Procedures

See Extended Examples for all 5 resolution options with full commands and rollback procedures.

Step-by-step remediation w/ rollback.

5 resolution options (brief):

  1. Rollback Deployment (fastest): For post-deployment errs

    kubectl rollout undo deployment/api-service
    

    Verify → Monitor → Confirm (err rate < 1%, latency normal, no alerts)

  2. Scale Up: High CPU|memory, conn pool exhaustion

    kubectl scale deployment/api-service --replicas=$((current * 3/2))
    
  3. Restart Service: Memory leaks, stuck conns, cache corruption

    kubectl rollout restart deployment/api-service
    
  4. Feature Flag | Circuit Breaker: Specific feature errs|external dep failures

    kubectl set env deployment/api-service FEATURE_NAME=false
    
  5. DB Remediation: Conns, slow queries, pool exhaustion

    -- Kill long-running queries, restart connection pool, increase pool size
    

Universal verify checklist:

  • Err rate < 1%
  • Latency P99 < threshold
  • Throughput at baseline
  • Resource healthy (CPU < 70%, Memory < 80%)
  • Deps healthy
  • User-facing tests pass
  • No active alerts

Rollback: Resolution worsens → pause|cancel → revert → reassess

Got: Resolution clear, verify checks, rollback options per action.

If err:

  • Granular steps for complex
  • Screenshots|diagrams for multi-step
  • Doc cmd outs (expected vs actual)
  • Separate runbook for complex resolution

Step 4: Escalation Paths

See Extended Examples for full escalation levels and contact directory template.

When + how to escalate.

Escalate immediately:

  • Customer-facing outage > 15 min
  • SLO err budget > 10% depleted
  • Data loss|corruption|security breach suspected
  • Can't ID root cause in 20 min
  • Mitigation fails|worsens

5 escalation levels:

  1. Primary On-Call (5 min response): Deploy fixes, rollback, scale (up to 30 min solo)
  2. Secondary On-Call (auto after 15 min): Investigation support
  3. Team Lead (architectural): DB changes, vendor escalation, > 1 hour
  4. Incident Commander (cross-team): Multi teams, customer comms, > 2 hours
  5. Executive (C-level): Major impact (>50% users), SLA breach, media|PR, > 4 hours

Process:

  1. Notify target: status, impact, actions taken, help needed, dashboard link
  2. Handoff: timeline, actions, access, remain available
  3. No silence: update every 15 min, ask questions, feedback

Contact directory: Table w/ role, Slack, phone, PagerDuty for:

  • Platform|DB|Security|Network teams
  • Incident Commander
  • External vendors (AWS, DB vendor, CDN provider)

Got: Clear escalation criteria, contact info accessible, paths align w/ org.

If err:

  • Validate contact current (test quarterly)
  • Decision tree for when to escalate
  • Examples of escalation msgs
  • Doc response time per level

Step 5: Comm Templates

See Extended Examples for all internal and external templates with full formatting.

Pre-written msgs for incident updates.

Internal (Slack #incident-response):

  1. Initial Declaration:

    🚨 INCIDENT: [Title] | Severity: [Critical/High/Medium]
    Impact: [users/services] | Owner: @username | Dashboard: [link]
    Quick Summary: [1-2 sentences] | Next update: 15 min
    
  2. Progress Update (every 15-30 min):

    📊 UPDATE #N | Status: [Investigating/Mitigating/Monitoring]
    Actions: [what we tried and outcomes]
    Theory: [what we think is happening]
    Next: [planned actions]
    
  3. Mitigation Complete:

    ✅ MITIGATION | Metrics: Error [before→after], Latency [before→after]
    Root Cause: [brief or "investigating"] | Monitoring 30min before resolved
    
  4. Resolution:

    🎉 RESOLVED | Duration: [time] | Root Cause + Impact + Follow-up actions
    
  5. False Alarm: No impact, no follow-up

External (status page):

  • Initial: Investigating, started time, next update in 15 min
  • Progress: ID'd cause (customer-friendly), implementing fix, est resolution
  • Resolution: Resolved time, root cause (simple), duration, prevention

Customer email template: Timeline, impact, resolution, prevention, compensation (if applicable)

Got: Templates save time, consistent comm, reduce cognitive load on responders.

If err:

  • Customize to company comm style
  • Pre-fill w/ common incident types
  • Slack workflow|bot to populate auto
  • Review during retrospectives

Step 6: Link Runbook → Monitoring

See Extended Examples for complete Prometheus alert configuration and Grafana dashboard JSON.

Integrate w/ alerts + dashboards.

Add runbook links to Prometheus alerts:

- alert: HighErrorRate
  annotations:
    runbook_url: "https://wiki.example.com/runbooks/high-error-rate"
    dashboard_url: "https://grafana.example.com/d/service-overview"
    incident_channel: "#incident-platform"

Embed quick diagnostic links in runbook:

  • Service Overview Dashboard
  • Error Rate Last 1h (Prometheus direct link)
  • Recent Error Logs (Loki|Grafana Explore)
  • Recent Deployments (GitHub|CI)
  • PagerDuty Incidents

Grafana dashboard panel w/ runbook links (md panel listing all incident runbooks w/ on-call + escalation)

Got: Responders access runbooks direct from alerts|dashboards, diagnostic queries pre-filled, one-click access.

If err:

  • Verify URLs accessible w/o VPN|login
  • URL shorteners for complex Grafana|Prometheus
  • Test links quarterly → no break
  • Browser bookmarks for frequent

Check

  • Runbook follows consistent template
  • Diagnostic procedures w/ specific queries + expected vals
  • Resolution actionable w/ clear cmds
  • Escalation criteria + contacts current
  • Comm templates for internal + external
  • Linked from monitoring alerts + dashboards
  • Tested during incident sim or actual
  • Responder feedback incorporated
  • Revision history tracked w/ dates + authors
  • Accessible w/o auth (or cached offline)

Traps

  • Too generic: Vague "check the logs" w/o specific queries → not actionable. Specific.
  • Outdated: Refs old systems|cmds → useless. Quarterly review.
  • No verify: Resolution w/o verify → false positives. "How to confirm fixed."
  • Missing rollback: Every action → rollback plan. Don't trap responders worse state.
  • Assume knowledge: Expert-only → excludes juniors. Write for least experienced on rotation.
  • No ownership: No owners → stale. Assign team|person responsible.
  • Hidden behind auth: Inaccessible during VPN|SSO issues → useless during crisis. Cache copies or public wiki.

→

  • configure-alerting-rules — Link runbooks to alert annotations for immediate access
  • build-grafana-dashboards — Embed runbook links in dashboards + diagnostic panels
  • setup-prometheus-monitoring — Diagnostic queries from Prometheus in runbook procedures
  • define-slo-sli-sla — Reference SLO impact in incident severity classification
저장한 Skills