---

name: submit-to-cran locale: caveman source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-05-03" description: > Complete procedure for submitting an R package to CRAN, including pre-submission checks (local, win-builder, R-hub), cran-comments.md preparation, URL and spell checking, and the submission itself. Covers first submissions and updates. Use when a package is ready for initial CRAN release, when submitting an updated version of an existing CRAN package, or when re-submitting after receiving CRAN reviewer feedback. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: r-packages complexity: advanced language: R tags: r, cran, submission, release, publishing

Submit to CRAN

Execute full CRAN submission workflow from pre-flight checks through submission.

When Use

• Package ready for initial CRAN release
• Submitting updated version of existing CRAN package
• Re-submitting after CRAN reviewer feedback

Inputs

• Required: R package passing local R CMD check with 0 errors and 0 warnings
• Required: Updated version number in DESCRIPTION
• Required: Updated NEWS.md with changes for this version
• Optional: Previous CRAN reviewer comments (for re-submissions)

Steps

Step 1: Version and NEWS Check

Verify DESCRIPTION has correct version:

desc::desc_get_version()

Verify NEWS.md has entry for this version. Entry should summarize user-facing changes.

Got: Version follows semantic versioning. NEWS.md has matching entry for this version.

If fail: Update version with usethis::use_version() (choose "major", "minor", or "patch"). Add NEWS.md entry summarizing user-facing changes.

Step 2: Local R CMD Check

devtools::check()

Got: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 notes (1 note acceptable for new submissions: "New submission").

If fail: Fix all errors and warnings before proceeding. Read check log at <pkg>.Rcheck/00check.log for details. Notes should be explained in cran-comments.md.

Step 3: Spell Check

devtools::spell_check()

Add legitimate words to inst/WORDLIST (one word per line, sorted alphabetical).

Got: No unexpected misspellings. All flagged words either corrected or added to inst/WORDLIST.

If fail: Fix genuine misspellings. Legitimate technical terms? Add to inst/WORDLIST (one word per line, alphabetical sorted).

Step 4: URL Check

urlchecker::url_check()

Got: All URLs return HTTP 200. No broken or redirected links.

If fail: Replace broken URLs. Use \doi{} for DOI links instead of raw URLs. Remove links to resources no longer exist.

Step 5: Win-Builder Checks

devtools::check_win_devel()
devtools::check_win_release()

Wait for email results (usual 15-30 minutes).

Got: 0 errors, 0 warnings on both Win-builder release and devel. Results arrive by email within 15-30 minutes.

If fail: Address platform-specific issues. Common causes: different compiler warnings, missing system dependencies, path separator differences. Fix local, re-submit to Win-builder.

Step 6: R-hub Check

rhub::rhub_check()

Checks on multiple platforms (Ubuntu, Windows, macOS).

Got: All platforms pass with 0 errors and 0 warnings.

If fail: Specific platform fails? Check R-hub build log for platform-specific errors. Use testthat::skip_on_os() or conditional code for platform-dependent behavior.

Step 7: Prepare cran-comments.md

Create or update cran-comments.md in package root:

## R CMD check results
0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 note

* This is a new release.

## Test environments
* local: Windows 11, R 4.5.0
* win-builder: R-release, R-devel
* R-hub: ubuntu-latest (R-release), windows-latest (R-release), macos-latest (R-release)

## Downstream dependencies
There are currently no downstream dependencies for this package.

Updates? Include:

• What changed (brief)
• Response to any previous reviewer feedback
• Reverse dependency check results if applicable

Got: cran-comments.md accurately summarizes check results across all test environments and explains any notes.

If fail: Check results differ across platforms? Document all variations. CRAN reviewers will check these claims against own tests.

Step 8: Final Pre-flight

# One last check
devtools::check()

# Verify the built tarball
devtools::build()

Got: Final devtools::check() passes clean. .tar.gz tarball built in parent directory.

If fail: Last-minute issue appears? Fix, re-run all checks from Step 2. Never submit with known failures.

Step 9: Submit

devtools::release()

Runs interactive checks and submits. Answer all questions honest.

Alternatively, submit manual at https://cran.r-project.org/submit.html by uploading tarball.

Got: Confirmation email from CRAN arrives within minutes. Click confirmation link to finalize submission.

If fail: Check email for rejection reasons. Common issues: examples too slow, missing \value tags, non-portable code. Fix issues, re-submit, note in cran-comments.md what changed.

Step 10: Post-Submission

After acceptance:

# Tag the release
usethis::use_github_release()

# Bump to development version
usethis::use_dev_version()

Got: GitHub release created with accepted version tag. DESCRIPTION bumped to development version (x.y.z.9000).

If fail: GitHub release fails? Create manual with gh release create. CRAN acceptance delayed? Wait for confirmation email before tagging.

Checks

• R CMD check returns 0 errors, 0 warnings on local machine
• Win-builder passes (release + devel)
• R-hub passes on all tested platforms
• cran-comments.md accurate describes check results
• All URLs valid
• No spelling errors
• Version number correct and incremented
• NEWS.md current
• DESCRIPTION metadata complete and accurate

Pitfalls

• Examples too slow: Wrap expensive examples in \donttest{}. CRAN enforces time limits.
• Non-standard file/dir names: Avoid files that trigger CRAN notes (check .Rbuildignore)
• Missing \value in docs: All exported functions need @return tag
• Vignette build failures: Ensure vignettes build in clean environment without your .Renviron
• DESCRIPTION Title format: Must be Title Case, no period at end, no "A Package for..."
• Forget reverse dependency checks: Updates? Run revdepcheck::revdep_check()

Examples

# Full pre-submission workflow
devtools::spell_check()
urlchecker::url_check()
devtools::check()
devtools::check_win_devel()
rhub::rhub_check()
# Wait for results...
devtools::release()

See Also

• release-package-version - version bumping, git tagging
• write-roxygen-docs - ensure documentation meets CRAN standards
• setup-github-actions-ci - CI checks that mirror CRAN expectations
• build-pkgdown-site - documentation site for accepted packages