인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
디자인 및 창작 · SKILL.md

run-chaos-experiment

run-chaos-experiment

Design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. Test system resilience through controlled fault injection, validate hypothesis-driven tests, and improve failure recovery. Use before major product launches, after architecture changes to validate resilience, during GameDays or disaster recovery drills, to validate assumptions abou…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: run-chaos-experiment locale: caveman source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-05-03" description: > Design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. Test system resilience through controlled fault injection, validate hypothesis-driven tests, and improve failure recovery. Use before major product launches, after architecture changes to validate resilience, during GameDays or disaster recovery drills, to validate assumptions about failure modes, or as part of an SRE maturity program. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: observability complexity: advanced language: multi tags: chaos-engineering, litmus, chaos-mesh, resilience, fault-injection

Run Chaos Experiment

Inject controlled failures. Test, improve resilience.

When Use

  • Before major launches (load testing)
  • After architecture changes (validate resilience)
  • During GameDays or DR drills
  • Validate assumptions about failure modes
  • Part of SRE maturity program

Inputs

  • Required: Kubernetes cluster (Litmus or Chaos Mesh)
  • Required: Steady-state definition (what "normal" looks)
  • Required: Hypothesis to test (e.g., "API stays up if one pod crashes")
  • Optional: Observability stack (Prometheus, Grafana) to measure impact
  • Optional: Rollback plan

Steps

Step 1: Define Steady State and Hypothesis

Document normal behavior.

## Steady State Definition

### Service: API Gateway
- **Availability**: 99.9% (< 0.1% error rate)
- **Latency**: p95 < 200ms
- **Throughput**: 1000 req/s
- **Dependencies**: Database (Postgres), Cache (Redis), Auth Service

### Metrics
- `rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[5m])`
- `histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))`
- `rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])`

## Hypothesis
**"If one API pod is killed, the remaining pods will handle the load with <5s
disruption and no increase in error rate."**

### Validation Criteria
- Error rate remains <1%
- p95 latency stays <300ms (50ms grace)
- Service recovers within 5 seconds
- No cascading failures to downstream services

Got: Clear, measurable definition of normal + success criteria.

If fail: Cannot define steady state? Observability insufficient. Add metrics first.

Step 2: Set Blast Radius Limits

Scope experiment to minimize risk.

# chaos-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: chaos-testing

---
# Label pods participating in chaos experiments
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  labels:
    chaos-enabled: "true"
    environment: staging  # NEVER production for first run

Set safeguards.

## Blast Radius Controls

### Environment
- **Scope**: Staging only (first 5 runs)
- **Production**: Only after 5 successful staging runs
- **Timing**: Business hours (09:00-17:00 local), never weekends/holidays

### Target Selection
- **Limit**: Max 1 pod per service
- **Percentage**: Max 25% of replicas
- **Exclusions**: Database, payment service, auth service (critical path)

### Auto-Abort Conditions
- Error rate >10% for >30 seconds
- Customer-facing alerts fire
- Manual abort signal from on-call engineer

### Rollback Plan
- Kubernetes will auto-restart killed pods
- Manual rollback: `kubectl rollout undo deployment/api`
- Incident declared if recovery takes >5 minutes

Got: Experiment has clear bounds, will not take down whole system.

If fail: Blast radius too large? Narrow scope. Start with one non-critical service.

Step 3: Install Chaos Mesh

Deploy Chaos Mesh (Kubernetes-native).

# Add Chaos Mesh Helm repo
helm repo add chaos-mesh https://charts.chaos-mesh.org
helm repo update

# Install Chaos Mesh in isolated namespace
helm install chaos-mesh chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh \
  --namespace chaos-mesh \
  --create-namespace \
  --set dashboard.create=true \
  --set controllerManager.replicaCount=1

# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n chaos-mesh

# Access dashboard
kubectl port-forward -n chaos-mesh svc/chaos-dashboard 2333:2333
# Open http://localhost:2333

Alt: Litmus (vendor-neutral).

# Install Litmus
kubectl apply -f https://litmuschaos.github.io/litmus/litmus-operator-v2.14.0.yaml

# Wait for Litmus pods
kubectl get pods -n litmus

# Install Litmus CRDs
kubectl apply -f https://hub.litmuschaos.io/api/chaos/master?file=charts/generic/experiments.yaml

Got: Chaos Mesh or Litmus running, dashboard accessible.

If fail: Check RBAC perms. Chaos tools need cluster-wide access.

Step 4: Create and Execute Experiment

Example: Pod Kill (Chaos Mesh).

# pod-kill-experiment.yaml
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
  name: api-pod-kill-test
  namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
  action: pod-kill
  mode: one  # Kill one pod only
  selector:
    namespaces:
      - production
    labelSelectors:
      app: api-gateway
      chaos-enabled: "true"
  duration: "30s"
  scheduler:
    cron: "@every 5m"  # Repeat every 5 minutes (for sustained testing)

Apply experiment.

# Apply experiment
kubectl apply -f pod-kill-experiment.yaml

# Watch experiment status
kubectl get podchaos -n chaos-testing -w

# View detailed status
kubectl describe podchaos api-pod-kill-test -n chaos-testing

# Check which pods were affected
kubectl get events -n production --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp | grep api-gateway

Monitor impact in Grafana.

# Error rate during experiment
rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5..", job="api"}[1m])

# Latency spike
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job="api"}[1m]))

# Pod restarts
rate(kube_pod_container_status_restarts_total{pod=~"api-.*"}[5m])

Got: Pod killed, Kubernetes restarts it, service continues with minor blip.

If fail: Error rate spikes or service degrades hard? Abort and investigate.

Step 5: Analyze Results and Iterate

Make experiment report.

# Chaos Experiment Report: API Pod Kill

**Date**: 2025-02-09
**Hypothesis**: API stays available if one pod crashes
**Tool**: Chaos Mesh
**Environment**: Staging
**Duration**: 30 seconds (pod kill + recovery)

## Results

### Metrics During Experiment
- **Error Rate**: Increased from 0.1% to 2.3% (spike lasted 8 seconds)
- **p95 Latency**: Increased from 180ms to 450ms (spike lasted 12 seconds)
- **Recovery Time**: 8 seconds (pod restart + load balancer update)

### Hypothesis Outcome
**FAILED**: Error rate exceeded 1% threshold, latency spike >300ms

## Root Cause Analysis
- Load balancer continued routing to killed pod for 8 seconds (stale endpoint)
- Readiness probe set to 10s interval (too slow)
- No pre-stop hook to drain connections gracefully

## Improvements Made
1. **Reduced readiness probe interval**: 10s → 2s
2. **Added pre-stop hook**: 5-second sleep for connection draining
3. **Tuned load balancer**: Enabled faster endpoint updates

## Follow-Up Experiment
- Re-run with same parameters in 1 week
- Expected: Error rate <1%, recovery <5s

Track experiments in log.

# chaos-experiment-log.csv
date,experiment,environment,status,error_rate_peak,recovery_time_s,outcome
2025-02-09,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,2.3%,8,failed
2025-02-16,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,0.8%,4,passed
2025-02-23,network-delay-db,staging,aborted,15%,N/A,failed

Got: Learnings captured, fixes done, follow-up scheduled.

If fail: No action taken post-experiment? Chaos = theater. Prioritize fixes.

Step 6: Graduate to Production (Carefully)

Once staging consistent.

# Production pod-kill experiment (more conservative)
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
  name: api-pod-kill-prod
  namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
  action: pod-kill
  mode: one
  selector:
    namespaces:
      - production
    labelSelectors:
      app: api-gateway
      chaos-enabled: "true"
  duration: "10s"  # Shorter than staging
  scheduler:
    cron: "0 10 * * 2"  # Tuesdays at 10 AM only (predictable, low-risk time)

Production safeguards.

# Create a kill switch for production chaos
kubectl create configmap chaos-killswitch \
  -n chaos-testing \
  --from-literal=enabled=true

# Update experiments to check kill switch
# (implementation depends on chaos tool)

Got: Prod experiments run during low-risk windows, kill switch ready.

If fail: Prod experiment causes incident? Disable immediately, post-mortem.

Checks

  • Steady state, hypothesis clearly defined
  • Blast radius limited (env, scope, timing)
  • Chaos tool (Chaos Mesh or Litmus) installed, tested
  • Experiment runs in staging
  • Results documented with metrics + analysis
  • Improvements done based on findings
  • Follow-up validates fixes
  • Prod experiments only after 5+ staging successes

Pitfalls

  • No hypothesis: Run chaos "to see what happens" = waste. Always have hypothesis.
  • Too broad scope: Kill all pods = tests DR not resilience. Start small.
  • Production-first: Never first experiment in prod. Staging first, always.
  • Ignore results: Chaos without action = theater. Fix what you learn.
  • Alert fatigue: Chaos triggers alerts. Annotate Grafana or silence expected.
  • No abort plan: If experiment goes wrong, need kill switch. Ready it.

See Also

  • setup-prometheus-monitoring - metrics to measure impact
  • configure-alerting-rules - alerts that fire during chaos (expected)
  • define-slo-sli-sla - steady state tied to SLOs
저장한 Skills