인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
개발 및 엔지니어링 · SKILL.md

k8s-debugger

k8s-debugger

Implements intelligent k8s debugger with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: k8s-debugger compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

  • guidance
  • examples
  • do-dont description: Implements intelligent k8s debugger with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: k8s-debugger, k8s debugger, how do i k8s-debugger, orchestrate k8s-debugger, automate k8s-debugger, agent k8s-debugger, kubernetes, container orchestration archetypes:
    • orchestration
    • strategic anti_triggers:
    • brainstorming
    • vague ideation
    • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

K8S Debugger

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for k8s debugger workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
  • Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
  • Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
  • Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
  • Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
  • Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
  • Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

  • Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
  • High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
  • Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
  • Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

  1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

  2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

    • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
    • Historical success rate for similar tasks
    • Skill availability and health status
    • Required dependencies and their availability

    Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

  3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

  4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

  5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

    • Retry with adjusted parameters
    • Try alternative skill from related-skills
    • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

    Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def parse_k8s_debug_request(
    user_query: str,
    cluster_context: Dict[str, Any],
    min_confidence: float = 0.7
) -> Optional[Dict]:
    """Parse Kubernetes debugging request and map to debugging strategy.
    
    Extracts resource types, namespaces, and error signatures from user input.
    Maps to appropriate debugging workflows based on k8s error patterns.
    
    Args:
        user_query: Natural language description of the k8s issue
        cluster_context: Active cluster config, available namespaces, auth tokens
        min_confidence: Minimum confidence threshold for strategy selection
        
    Returns:
        Debugging strategy dict with target resources, error type, and steps
    """
    if not user_query or not user_query.strip():
        raise ValueError("Kubernetes debug query cannot be empty")
        
    # Extract k8s entities and error signatures
    entities = _extract_k8s_entities(user_query)
    error_type = _classify_k8s_error(user_query)
    
    # Map to debugging strategy
    strategy_map = {
        "CrashLoopBackOff": "pod_restart_analysis",
        "ImagePullBackOff": "registry_auth_check",
        "OOMKilled": "resource_limit_analysis",
        "Pending": "scheduler_affinity_check",
        "default": "general_cluster_health"
    }
    
    strategy_name = strategy_map.get(error_type, "general_cluster_health")
    
    # Validate against available cluster context
    if not _verify_cluster_access(cluster_context, entities.get("namespace")):
        raise PermissionError("Insufficient RBAC permissions for target namespace")
        
    return {
        "strategy": strategy_name,
        "target_resources": entities.get("resources", []),
        "namespace": entities.get("namespace", "default"),
        "error_signature": error_type,
        "confidence": 0.85,
        "steps": _generate_debug_steps(strategy_name)
    }

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def execute_k8s_debug_workflow(
    strategy: Dict,
    cluster_client: Any,
    max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
    """Execute Kubernetes debugging workflow with resilient error handling.
    
    Runs targeted kubectl diagnostics, parses cluster state, and applies
    fallback strategies if initial diagnostics are inconclusive.
    
    Args:
        strategy: Debugging strategy from parse_k8s_debug_request
        cluster_client: Initialized kubernetes client or kubectl wrapper
        max_retries: Maximum retry attempts for transient API errors
        
    Returns:
        Debug findings dict with root cause, evidence, and remediation steps
    """
    namespace = strategy.get("namespace", "default")
    resources = strategy.get("target_resources", [])
    
    for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
        try:
            # Gather diagnostic data in parallel
            pod_status = cluster_client.get_resource_status("pods", namespace)
            recent_events = cluster_client.get_events(namespace, since="1h")
            resource_logs = cluster_client.get_logs(resources, tail=100)
            
            # Analyze findings against known k8s failure patterns
            findings = _analyze_k8s_findings(pod_status, recent_events, resource_logs)
            
            if findings.get("root_cause"):
                return {
                    "success": True,
                    "strategy_executed": strategy["strategy"],
                    "findings": findings,
                    "remediation": _generate_remediation(findings),
                    "attempts": attempt + 1
                }
                
        except ApiException as e:
            if e.status == 429:  # API server throttling
                time.sleep(2 ** attempt)
                continue
            elif e.status == 403:
                raise PermissionError("RBAC denied during diagnostic collection") from e
            raise
            
    # Fallback: Escalate to cluster-level diagnostics
    return _execute_cluster_fallback_diagnostics(strategy, cluster_client)

MUST DO

  • Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
  • Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
  • Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
  • Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
  • Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

  • Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
  • Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
  • Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
  • Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
  • Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
  • Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

  • Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
  • Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
  • Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
  • Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
  • Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
  • Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
  • Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
  • Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

  1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
  2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
  3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
  4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
  5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
  6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |



Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
  • Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
  • Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
  • Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

  • Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
  • Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
  • Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
  • Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

저장한 Skills