인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
디자인 및 창작 · SKILL.md

data-quality-checks

data-quality-checks

Design the data quality checks for a table or pipeline across the standard dimensions. Use when asked to add data quality tests, define DQ checks, catch bad data before it hits dashboards, or set up monitoring for a dataset. Produces a checks plan across completeness, validity, uniqueness, freshness, consistency, and accuracy — each with the rule, severity,…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: data-quality-checks description: "Design the data quality checks for a table or pipeline across the standard dimensions. Use when asked to add data quality tests, define DQ checks, catch bad data before it hits dashboards, or set up monitoring for a dataset. Produces a checks plan across completeness, validity, uniqueness, freshness, consistency, and accuracy — each with the rule, severity, and where it runs (dbt test / Great Expectations / SQL assertion)."

Data Quality Checks Skill

Bad data quietly poisons dashboards and models until someone notices the number is wrong. The fix is checks that fail loudly before that — across the standard DQ dimensions. This skill designs them for a specific table/pipeline: the exact rule per dimension, its severity (block vs. warn), and where it runs (dbt test, Great Expectations, or a SQL assertion), so quality is enforced, not hoped for.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • The table/pipeline and what it represents (grain, key columns).
  • The columns that matter — keys, required fields, enums, ranges, dates.
  • Freshness expectation — how current the data must be.
  • Tooling — dbt tests, Great Expectations, Soda, or raw SQL assertions.

Output Format

Data Quality Checks: [table]

Checks organised by dimension — each with the rule, severity (🔴 block the pipeline / 🟡 warn), and where it runs:

DimensionCheckRuleSeverityImplement as
Completenessrequired fields non-nullnot_null on [cols]🔴dbt test
Uniquenessgrain key uniqueunique on [key]🔴dbt test
Validityvalues in allowed set/rangeaccepted_values / range🟡GE / SQL
Freshnessdata is currentmax(loaded_at) within SLA🔴dbt source freshness
Consistencycross-field / cross-tablee.g. totals reconcile, FK exists🟡SQL assertion
Accuracymatches a source of truthreconcile vs. system-of-record🟡SQL assertion

Notes:

  • Severity discipline — only block on checks that should stop the pipeline (a duplicated grain key, stale critical data). Over-blocking trains people to ignore alerts.
  • Where to check — at ingestion (catch early) vs. in the model vs. post-build; recommend per check.
  • On failure — what happens (halt, quarantine rows, alert + continue) and who's paged.

Quality Checks

  • Covers the core dimensions (completeness, uniqueness, validity, freshness, consistency)
  • Each check has an explicit rule and a severity (block vs. warn)
  • Severity is disciplined — only truly critical checks block the pipeline
  • Freshness has a measurable SLA, not "should be recent"
  • Each check names where it runs and what happens on failure

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not block the pipeline on every check — alert fatigue makes people ignore the real failures; reserve 🔴 for critical
  • Do not only test the happy path — the grain key, nulls, and freshness are where the real breakage hides
  • Do not write checks with no failure action — a test that fails into the void changes nothing
  • Do not skip freshness — stale data that looks fine is the most dangerous kind
  • Do not check only one table in isolation — cross-table consistency (FKs, reconciliations) catches integration bugs

Based On

Data-quality practice — the six DQ dimensions, dbt tests / Great Expectations / source-freshness, severity-tiered enforcement.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Define DQ checks."
  • "Catch bad data before it hits dashboards."
  • "Set up monitoring for a dataset."
저장한 Skills