인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
데이터 및 연구 · SKILL.md

attio-prod-checklist

attio-prod-checklist

Run an evidence-based production-readiness review for an Attio integration across identity, scopes, data ownership, retries, webhooks, observability, rollback, and support. Use when preparing to enable production Attio traffic. Trigger with "Attio production checklist", "Attio go-live", or "review Attio release".

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: attio-prod-checklist description: >- Run an evidence-based production-readiness review for an Attio integration across identity, scopes, data ownership, retries, webhooks, observability, rollback, and support. Use when preparing to enable production Attio traffic. Trigger with "Attio production checklist", "Attio go-live", or "review Attio release". argument-hint: "[repository-path] [release-id]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.8.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • attio
  • production model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code

Attio Production Readiness Review

Overview

This skill produces a release decision from repository and operational evidence. A checked box without a receipt is unresolved, not complete.

Prerequisites

  • Exact artifact, environment, workspace, and release owner
  • Endpoint inventory with methods and required scopes
  • Data ownership, retention, and deletion policy
  • Monitoring, incident, rollback, and support paths

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect auth, mappings, tests, workflows, observability, and rollback code. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio documentation. Use Write or Edit only to remediate a named gap with verification.

Current Contract

  • Authentication must match the tenancy model and use endpoint-derived least privilege.
  • Record and entry identity, owned fields, and destructive boundaries must be explicit.
  • Retries must honor Retry-After and exclude permanent request failures.
  • Webhook receivers need raw-body HMAC verification and idempotent processing.
  • Pagination mode must be confirmed endpoint by endpoint.

Authentication

Verify secret location, workspace or tenant binding, scopes, rotation owner, revocation procedure, and absence from logs and artifacts. Use Bearer authentication for REST requests.

Instructions

  1. Bind the review to the exact artifact, environment, workspace, and endpoint inventory.
  2. Verify contract tests, schema discovery, field ownership, identity, and pagination termination.
  3. Verify credential storage, endpoint scopes, tenant isolation, rotation, and redaction.
  4. Verify timeouts, bounded retries, read/write traffic controls, and 429 handling.
  5. For webhooks, verify HTTPS, raw-body signature checks, idempotency keys, quick acknowledgement, and replay-safe workers.
  6. Exercise read-only smoke, approved canary, alert path, rollback, and recovery evidence.
  7. Record PASS, FAIL, or explicitly accepted risk for every item and name the approver.

Approval Boundaries

Only the release owner may accept unresolved data-loss, authorization, privacy, or rollback risk. Do not convert missing evidence into PASS.

Output

Return the bound release identity, control matrix with receipts, failed gates, accepted risks, approvers, and final GO or NO-GO decision.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Artifact or workspace is unboundReturn NO-GO.
Scope evidence is missingReturn NO-GO until endpoint mapping exists.
Webhook replay is untestedDisable webhook-driven mutation or return NO-GO.
Rollback cannot be exercisedLimit rollout or return NO-GO.

Examples

Input:

release=exact-sha; workspace=production-alias; canary=approved-record

Expected handoff:

decision=NO-GO; blocker=missing webhook replay proof; owner=integration-team

Resources

저장한 Skills