executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
suede-sales-enablementSuede-owned sales-enablement discipline. Use when creating pitch decks, one-pagers, objection guides, demo scripts, talk tracks, battle cards, proposal structures, buyer cards, or deal-level ROI framing. NOT FOR: setting price or terms (use suede-pricing), building the offer (use suede-offers), sending outreach (use suede-cold-email), or publishing unsuppor…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Suede Sales Enablement turns verified positioning, proof, and deal context into rep-usable decks, one-pagers, objection guides, demos, and playbooks. Every asset separates sourced claims from modeled value and remains a draft until its audience and version are approved.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Value Proposition & Differentiators
Sales Motion
Collateral Needs
Current State
Involve reps in creation. Use their language, not marketing's. If reps rewrite your deck before sending it, you wrote the wrong deck. Test drafts with your top performers first.
Tailor to persona, deal stage, and use case. A deck for a CTO should look different from one for a VP of Sales. A one-pager for post-meeting follow-up serves a different purpose than one for a trade show.
Reps need information in 3 seconds, not 30. Use bold headers, short bullets, and visual hierarchy. If a rep can't find the answer mid-call, the doc has failed.
Every claim connects to revenue, efficiency, or risk reduction. Features mean nothing without the "so what." Replace "AI-powered analytics" with "cut reporting time by 80%."
| Buyer | Emphasize | De-emphasize |
|---|---|---|
| Technical buyer | Architecture, security, integrations, API | ROI calculations, business metrics |
| Economic buyer | ROI, payback period, total cost, risk | Technical details, implementation specifics |
| Champion | Internal selling points, quick wins, peer proof | Deep technical or financial detail |
For full slide-by-slide guidance: See references/deck-frameworks.md
For templates by use case: See references/one-pager-templates.md
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Price | "Too expensive," "No budget this quarter," "Competitor is cheaper" |
| Timing | "Not the right time," "Maybe next quarter," "Too busy to implement" |
| Competition | "We already use X," "What makes you different?" |
| Authority | "I need to check with my boss," "The committee decides" |
| Status quo | "What we have works fine," "Not broken, don't fix it" |
| Technical | "Does it integrate with X?," "Security concerns," "Can it scale?" |
For each objection, document:
For the full objection library: See references/objection-library.md
Inputs (current state metrics the prospect provides):
Calculations (your formula for value):
Outputs (what the prospect sees):
| Persona | Cares About | Lead With |
|---|---|---|
| CTO / VP Eng | Architecture, scale, security, team velocity | Technical superiority, integration depth |
| VP Sales | Pipeline, quota attainment, rep productivity | Revenue impact, time savings per rep |
| CFO | Total cost, payback period, risk | ROI, cost reduction, financial predictability |
| End user | Ease of use, daily workflow, learning curve | Time saved, frustration eliminated |
Default to slide-based: the ROI story lives in the deck the rep already presents. Escape to a spreadsheet when the prospect supplies and wants to change their own inputs; build a web tool only when deal volume justifies it.
| Type | Duration | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery call | 30 min | Qualify, understand pain, map buying process |
| First demo | 30-45 min | Show 3-4 workflows tied to their pain |
| Technical deep-dive | 45-60 min | Architecture, security, integrations, API |
| Executive overview | 20-30 min | Business outcomes, ROI, strategic alignment |
For full script templates: See references/demo-scripts.md
Marketing case studies tell a story. Sales case studies arm reps with fast-access proof. Keep them short, outcome-focused, and tagged for retrieval.
Organize case studies so reps can find the right one instantly:
Review quarterly, get input from top reps, remove anything outdated, and assign a named owner.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Role / title | Common titles and reporting structure |
| Goals | What success looks like for them |
| Pains | What frustrates them daily |
| Top objections | The 3-5 objections you'll hear from this role |
| Evaluation criteria | How they judge solutions |
| Buying process | Their role in the decision, who they influence |
| Messaging angle | The one sentence that resonates most |
Deliver the right format for each asset type:
| Asset | Deliverable |
|---|---|
| Sales deck | Slide-by-slide outline with headline, body copy, and speaker notes |
| One-pager | Full copy with layout guidance (visual hierarchy, sections) |
| Objection doc | Table format: objection, response, proof point, follow-up |
| Demo script | Scene-by-scene with timing, talk track, and interaction points |
| ROI calculator | Input fields, formulas, output display with sample data |
| Playbook | Structured document with table of contents and sections |
| Persona card | One-page card format per persona |
| Proposal | Section-by-section copy with customization notes |
Every proof point and every ROI figure in a delivered asset carries an inline tag: [source: named customer / study / internal report + date] or [modeled, assumptions: the inputs used]. An untagged number is a delivery blocker: tag it or cut it before the asset goes out. The sales deck deliverable uses this unit, repeated for each of the 11 slides above:
### Slide N: [slide name]
**Headline:** [the single idea, written as a sentence]
**Body copy:** [on-slide text, minimal]
**Speaker notes:** [what the rep says out loud, not a re-read of the slide]
**Visual:** [chart / screenshot / logo wall / none]
**Proof:** [source: …] or [modeled, assumptions: …] for every number above
Partner platforms such as Introw can support engagement tracking, deal registration, and mutual action plans. Treat that as an evaluation lead, not a guaranteed integration: verify current vendor documentation, authenticated access, pricing, permissions, and data-export behavior before use.
suede-product-marketing for approved positioning and proof context.suede-competitors for comparison and battle-card evidence.suede-pricing for pricing and packaging decisions.suede-revops for pipeline stages, routing, and deal-desk operations.