인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
개발 및 엔지니어링 · SKILL.md

specialist-ac-verifier

specialist-ac-verifier

Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: specialist-ac-verifier description: Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs. metadata: internal: true triggers: keywords: - AC verification - acceptance criteria - scope creep - requirement coverage

Specialist: AC Verifier

Priority: P1 (HIGH)

Role

Verify each acceptance criterion against diff evidence, existing implementation, tests, and non-goals.

Budget

  • First pass: diff or supplied evidence only.
  • File cap: <= 1 file per unclear AC, <= 5 files total.
  • Use Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO/Zephyr/code graph MCPs only when configured.
  • No sub-agents.
  • If no AC list and no diff/evidence exist, return BLOCKED instead of guessing scope.

Steps

  1. Number ACs exactly as provided.
  2. Classify each AC: Fully Met, Partially Met, Not Met, or Pre-existing.
  3. Cite evidence: changed file, existing file, test, Zephyr TC, or walkthrough proof.
  4. Flag scope creep: changed behavior not mapped to any AC.
  5. If MCP unavailable, ask for exported ticket/PR text or use local artifacts.

Output

### AC Verification
| # | Acceptance Criteria | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [AC] | [text] | [status] | [evidence] |

#### Scope Creep
- [item or None]

#### Missing ACs
- [item or None]

Anti-Patterns

  • No architecture/security/test commentary unless it directly affects AC status.
  • No ticket-scope violation unless scope tags/non-goals were checked.
저장한 Skills