인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
개발 및 엔지니어링 · SKILL.md

review-session

review-session

Review what changed in this session with RepoPilot before claiming work is done or that tests pass. Use after edits to tests, CI config, auth, or request handling, and whenever you are about to say "all tests pass".

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: review-session description: Review what changed in this session with RepoPilot before claiming work is done or that tests pass. Use after edits to tests, CI config, auth, or request handling, and whenever you are about to say "all tests pass".

Review the session with RepoPilot

RepoPilot compares the repository with the snapshot taken when this session started. It is deterministic and local: the same change gives the same answer.

  1. Run repopilot review --since-snapshot.

  2. Read Decision, then the Definitely sensitive and Maybe sensitive lists.

  3. For every integrity.* signal — a focused, skipped, or removed test, a test that lost assertions, or a new suppression — either restore the check or state plainly in your reply why the change is intended. A green test run does not answer these signals: the run is what changed.

  4. For security signals (auth check removed, untrusted input reaching a sink), confirm the guard still exists on that path or fix it.

  5. Treat behavioral.quiet-fallback-introduced as a review candidate, not proof of harm. Inspect the caught operation and returned fallback, and preserve recovery behavior when it is intentional. This medium-confidence signal does not block the review gate.

Do not report the work as complete while a weakened check or a removed safeguard is open and unexplained. Other sensitive signals, such as a changed workflow or dependency, are context for the reviewer: mention them, but they do not need to be undone.

저장한 Skills