brainstorming
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
peer-review-loopPeer Review Ralph Loop — combines Cavekit kits with a Ralph Loop and true cross-model peer review using Codex (OpenAI). Claude builds from specs; Codex reviews adversarially. Primary path: Codex CLI delegation via codex-review.sh (fast, no MCP overhead). Legacy fallback: Codex as MCP server when CLI delegation is unavailable. Covers setup, iteration pattern…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Run a Cavekit cavekit through a Ralph Loop where Claude builds and Codex adversarially reviews. This is the most rigorous automated quality process available: every few iterations, a completely different model (different training data, different biases, different blind spots) challenges your implementation.
| Factor | Single-Model Loop | Peer Review Loop |
|---|---|---|
| Blind spots | Same model, same blind spots every iteration | Two models catch different classes of issues |
| Cavekit drift | Builder may silently deviate from cavekit | Peer reviewer checks cavekit compliance explicitly |
| Quality floor | Converges to "good enough for one model" | Converges to "survives cross-examination" |
| Dead ends | May retry failed approaches | Peer reviewer flags repeated patterns |
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Ralph Loop │
│ (Stop hook feeds same prompt each iteration) │
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ │
│ │ Claude │───▶│ Build from │───▶│ Commit │ │
│ │ (Build) │ │ cavekit + │ │ changes │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────┬─────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ │
│ │ Fix │◀──│ Parse │◀──│ Codex CLI │ │
│ │ findings │ │ findings │ │ (Review) │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────────┘ └────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Completion: all cavekit requirements met + │
│ no CRITICAL/HIGH findings │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The peer review loop supports two invocation paths:
Codex CLI delegation (primary) — Uses scripts/codex-review.sh which
calls codex directly in --approval-mode full-auto with a structured
review prompt. Faster, no MCP server overhead, findings are parsed and
appended to context/impl/impl-review-findings.md automatically.
MCP server (legacy fallback) — Configures Codex as an MCP server in
.mcp.json. Claude calls the MCP tool on review iterations. Used only when
Codex CLI delegation is unavailable (e.g., older Codex versions).
The build script (setup-build.sh) auto-detects which path to use: if
codex-review.sh is present and codex CLI is available, it uses CLI
delegation. Otherwise it falls back to MCP configuration.
# Basic: implement a cavekit with peer review
/ck:peer-review-loop context/kits/cavekit-auth.md
# With options
/ck:peer-review-loop context/kits/cavekit-api.md --max-iterations 20 --codex-model gpt-5.4-mini
# Review-only mode (review existing code, don't build new)
/ck:peer-review-loop context/kits/cavekit-api.md --review-only
# Review every iteration instead of every 2nd
/ck:peer-review-loop context/kits/cavekit-auth.md --review-interval 1
.mcp.json (if not already configured)When codex CLI is available, the loop delegates review to scripts/codex-review.sh
which exposes the bp_codex_review function. This runs Codex in full-auto mode with
a structured adversarial review prompt, parses findings into a standardized table, and
appends them to context/impl/impl-review-findings.md.
# What the build loop runs on review iterations:
source scripts/codex-review.sh
bp_codex_review --base main
The CLI path is faster (no MCP server startup), produces structured findings with severity levels (P0-P3), and handles fallback gracefully if Codex is unavailable.
When Codex CLI delegation is not available, the command configures Codex as an MCP server automatically:
{
"mcpServers": {
"codex-reviewer": {
"command": "codex",
"args": ["mcp-server", "-c", "model=\"gpt-5.4\""]
}
}
}
Claude calls this MCP server on review iterations to get peer review feedback. The MCP server exposes Codex as a tool that accepts prompts and returns responses — Claude sends the cavekit + code diff, Codex returns findings.
Use --codex-model to specify which OpenAI model Codex should use:
/ck:peer-review-loop cavekit.md --codex-model gpt-5.4-mini # faster, cheaper
/ck:peer-review-loop cavekit.md --codex-model gpt-5.4 # default, most capable
Iteration 1: BUILD — Read cavekit, implement first requirement
Iteration 2: REVIEW — Call Codex CLI (or MCP fallback), get findings, fix CRITICAL/HIGH
Iteration 3: BUILD — Continue implementing, address remaining findings
Iteration 4: REVIEW — Call Codex CLI (or MCP fallback) again, new findings on new code
...
Iteration N: BUILD — All requirements met, all findings fixed
→ outputs <promise>SPEC COMPLETE</promise>
The review interval is configurable. Default is every 2nd iteration.
Use --review-interval 1 for maximum rigor (review every iteration).
Review findings are tracked in context/peer-review-findings.md:
# Peer Review Findings
## Latest Review: Iteration 4 — 2026-03-14T10:30:00Z
### Reviewer: Codex (gpt-5.4)
| # | Severity | File | Issue | Status |
|---|----------|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | CRITICAL | src/auth.ts:L42 | Missing input validation on token | FIXED |
| 2 | HIGH | src/auth.ts:L67 | Race condition in session refresh | FIXED |
| 3 | MEDIUM | src/auth.ts:L15 | Unused import | NEW |
| 4 | LOW | src/auth.ts:L3 | Comment typo | WONTFIX |
## History
### Iteration 2
| # | Severity | File | Issue | Status |
|---|----------|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | CRITICAL | src/auth.ts:L20 | SQL injection in login query | FIXED |
The loop exits when the completion promise is output. The prompt instructs Claude to ONLY output it when ALL of these are true:
Alternates between implementing cavekit requirements and calling Codex for review. Use for greenfield implementation from a cavekit.
--review-only)Skips building. Each iteration calls Codex to review existing code against the cavekit, then fixes issues found. Use when code already exists and you want peer review QA.
npm install -g @openai/codexcodex login or env var)The peer review loop has converged when:
If the loop hits max iterations without converging:
context/peer-review-findings.md for persistent issues/ck:revise to trace issues back to kits