---

name: control-plan description: >- Control Plan — build, review, or audit a Prototype, Pre-launch, or Production Control Plan linked to PFMEA failure modes and controls. Use when creating a new control plan, updating after a process change or corrective action, or auditing an existing CP for completeness and PFMEA alignment. Covers AIAG Control Plan reference manual and IATF 16949 §8.5.1. license: MIT metadata: author: RBraga01 version: "1.1" iso-9001: "8.5.1" iatf-16949: "8.5.1" aiag-reference: "AIAG Control Plan Reference Manual" domain: quality-engineering subdomain: planning industries: automotive,electronics,aerospace,medical,general status: approved created: "2026-06-06" last_updated: "2026-06-06" updated_by: migmcc reviewed_by: RBraga01 standard_edition: "AIAG Control Plan Reference Manual (1995) / IATF 16949:2016 §8.5.1"

Control Plan

When to use

Use this skill when:

• Creating a new Control Plan for prototype, pre-launch, or production
• Reviewing an existing Control Plan for completeness and accuracy
• Updating the CP after a process change, corrective action (D7), or PFMEA update
• Auditing a supplier's Control Plan during qualification or an IATF audit
• Linking PFMEA controls to the Control Plan after FMEA review

Prerequisites

• Process Flow Diagram (required — CP must mirror the process flow sequence)
• PFMEA (required — CP controls derive from PFMEA recommended actions)
• Drawing with ballooned characteristics and tolerance data
• List of special and significant characteristics (SC, CC, KPC, KCC)
• MSA results for measurement systems referenced in the CP (for production CP)

Workflow

Step 1 — Determine the CP type

Type	When	Purpose
Prototype	During prototype builds	Describes dimensional, material, and functional tests in prototype phase
Pre-launch	After prototype, before PPAP	Describes controls in place during pilot/pre-production runs
Production	After PPAP approval, at SOP	The living document — updated throughout product life

All three types may coexist during APQP phases. The Production CP is the one submitted as PPAP Element 7.

Step 2 — Build the Control Plan structure

The CP is a table with one row per characteristic per process step. Each row contains:

Header section (document-level):

• Control Plan number and revision
• Part number and revision
• Part name / description
• Supplier / plant
• Supplier code (OEM code)
• Key contact / phone
• Core team (multi-functional)
• Date (original) and date (revised)
• Customer engineering approval (name/date) — if required
• Customer quality approval (name/date) — if required
• Supplier approval (name/date)

Detail columns (one row per characteristic):

Column	What to enter
Part/process number	Reference number from Process Flow
Process name / operation description	Name of the process step
Machine, device, jig, or tool	Equipment used at this step
Number	Characteristic number (links to balloon drawing)
Product characteristic	Product feature being controlled (dimension, material property, appearance)
Process characteristic	Process parameter being controlled (temperature, pressure, speed, torque)
Special characteristic classification	SC, CC, KPC, KCC, *, ▲ per customer symbology
Product/process specification / tolerance	Nominal value and tolerance band
Evaluation / measurement technique	Gauge type, method, or test used
Sample size	Number of parts per sample
Frequency	How often samples are taken (every hour, every lot, 100%)
Control method	How the process is controlled (SPC chart, go/no-go gauge, visual, 100% inspection)
Reaction plan	What to do if out-of-control or out-of-specification (who, what action, containment)

Step 3 — Populate from PFMEA

For each high-severity failure mode in the PFMEA:

1. Identify the current prevention and detection controls from the PFMEA
2. Transfer these controls into the corresponding CP row
3. The reaction plan must address what happens if the control detects a non-conformance

Every special characteristic (SC, CC, ★, ◆) in the PFMEA must appear in the CP. Every recommended action completed in the PFMEA must be reflected in the updated CP controls.

Step 4 — Special characteristics — mandatory coverage

Classification	OEM symbol	CP requirement
Safety / Regulatory	★ SC / ⬟	100% inspection OR demonstrated Cpk ≥ 1.67 + statistical monitoring
Critical Characteristic	CC / ◆	Same as above — automatic stop if out of spec
Significant Characteristic	SC (Ford) / KPC	Process monitoring with defined sample plan and reaction
Key Control Characteristic	KCC	Process parameter monitoring (not product) — SPC or other control

OEM symbol conventions vary. Always use the exact symbol specified in the customer's CSR:

• Ford: CC (Critical Characteristic) and SC (Significant Characteristic) — do not use ★ or ◆
• GM: ★ for safety-critical; Δ for significant
• VW / Audi: D (design feature, = CC), E (significant characteristic), I (functional dimension) per FORMEL Q
• BMW: G-SC (significant characteristic), G-CC (critical characteristic) per BMW standard
• Stellantis: CC and SC per MAQMSR — requires AIAG-VDA FMEA format alignment

Using the wrong symbol for the customer's OEM is an immediate finding at PPAP and IATF audit.

For all special characteristics: the reaction plan must specify who is notified, containment action, and when the process can restart.

Step 5 — Reaction plan requirements

Every row in the CP must have a reaction plan. Minimum requirements:

• Who is responsible for taking action
• What immediate containment is applied (tag, sort, hold, stop production)
• Who is notified (supervisor, quality, engineering)
• When production may restart (after what verification)
• Reference to relevant Work Instruction or SOP for the reaction

A reaction plan that says only "notify supervisor" or "quarantine parts" is insufficient — it must specify the next step after notification.

Step 6 — Audit an existing Control Plan

When reviewing a supplier's or internal CP, check:

Structure:

• All process steps from the Process Flow are represented
• Each special characteristic has its own dedicated row
• Revision level matches the current PFMEA and drawing revision

Characteristics:

• All SC/CC/KPC/KCC are listed with correct classification symbols
• Product AND process characteristics are both covered (not just product)
• Tolerances match the current released drawing

Controls:

• Measurement technique is specific (gauge type, not just "measure")
• Sample size and frequency are defined (not "as required" or "as needed")
• 100% inspection is specified where Cpk < 1.33
• SPC control charts are specified for characteristics where they are required

Reaction plan:

• Every row has a reaction plan
• Reaction plans specify concrete actions (not just "notify supervisor")
• Reaction plans are consistent with PFMEA failure mode severity

Alignment:

• CP controls match PFMEA current controls column for each failure mode
• Completed PFMEA recommended actions are reflected in updated controls
• CP revision date is more recent than most recent PFMEA update date

Validation criteria

A complete Production Control Plan for PPAP submission must:

• Cover every operation in the Process Flow
• Include every special and significant characteristic with correct classification
• Have a MSA-validated measurement system for every variable characteristic on SC/CC
• Have a reaction plan for every row
• Be signed by the APQP team (multi-functional) and have customer approval if required
• Match the PFMEA revision level

Common mistakes

• Control Plan created without reference to PFMEA — controls are generic, not linked to actual failure modes
• Reaction plan says "notify supervisor" only — not a reaction plan, just escalation
• Missing process characteristics — CP only controls product dimensions, not process parameters like temperature or torque
• Sample plan says "as required" — must specify a number and frequency
• SC/CC characteristics not identified with correct customer symbol — auditor will flag this immediately
• CP not updated after D7 of an 8D — the most common disconnect in corrective action systems
• Gauge type not specified — "visual inspection" or "measure" is not sufficient; must name the tool

Output Format

At the start of each use, ask the user:

"How would you like to receive the output? A — Structured Markdown (formatted tables and sections, ready to copy) B — Plain tables (simplified structure for Excel or Word) C — Narrative report (flowing text for a formal document or email)

Default: A."

Adapt all output sections to the chosen format. If the platform or session context already defines a format preference, skip this question.

Changelog

Version	Date	Author	Change
1.0	2026-06-06	@RBraga01	Initial release
1.1	2026-06-06	@migmcc	Added OEM-specific special characteristic symbol conventions (Ford, GM, VW, BMW, Stellantis) in Step 4