인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
생산성 및 협업 · SKILL.md

summary-judgment

summary-judgment

Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: summary-judgment language: en description: Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome. tags:

  • analysis
  • litigation
  • motion
  • summarization
  • summary

Summary Judgment Analysis

Structured summary of a summary judgment motion, order, or decision for rapid assessment without reading the full document.

Required Inputs

  1. Summary judgment document (motion, opposition, reply, and/or court order)
  2. Case caption and docket number
  3. Jurisdiction (federal or state; which court)

Quick Start

  1. Identify the motion type (MSJ / Partial MSJ / Cross-MSJ), moving party, and disposition.
  2. Extract undisputed material facts; flag genuine disputes.
  3. Map each claim or defense to the court's ruling and reasoning.
  4. Identify surviving issues for trial.
  5. Assess practical implications: appealability, trial scope, relief, deadlines, settlement impact.

Output Structure

1. Executive Overview

FieldContent
Case captionFull caption with docket number
CourtJurisdiction, judge
Motion typeMSJ / Partial MSJ / Cross-MSJ
Moving partyName and role
DispositionGranted / Denied / Granted in part
DateDate of order

Follow with a 2–3 sentence plain-language summary of the ruling and its bottom-line effect.

2. Undisputed Material Facts

List facts the court deemed established (chronological or thematic). Flag:

  • Genuine disputes → mark DISPUTED
  • Evidentiary rulings excluding evidence
  • Credibility determinations that influenced the outcome

3. Claims/Defenses Addressed

For each claim or defense ruled upon:

ElementDetail
Claim/DefenseName and legal basis
Legal standardStatute, rule, or common-law test
Key authorityPrimary cases/statutes relied on
Moving party's burdenHow the court assessed the initial burden
Non-movant's responseWhether genuine issues of material fact were raised
RulingGranted/Denied with reasoning

4. Surviving Issues

  • Claims or defenses remaining for trial
  • Unresolved factual disputes
  • Conditions or limitations (e.g., leave to amend)

5. Practical Implications

QuestionAnswer
Final/appealable?Immediately appealable or interlocutory
Trial scopeIssues proceeding to trial
Relief grantedDismissal, judgment entry, damages, fees, injunctive relief
Deadlines/obligationsImmediate compliance requirements
Settlement impactHow the ruling shifts leverage

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Accuracy over brevity — never mischaracterize holdings; distinguish undisputed facts from legal conclusions.
  • Burden-shifting — always trace whether the movant met the initial burden (Celotex / state equivalent) and whether the non-movant raised genuine disputes.
  • Jurisdiction — note federal (FRCP 56) vs. state rules; flag jurisdiction-specific standards (e.g., heightened MSJ thresholds).
  • Standard of review — note the standard applied (all inferences to non-movant) and whether the court deviated.
  • No editorial opinions — do not predict appeal outcomes or insert strategy unless specifically requested.
  • Ambiguity — when the court's reasoning supports multiple interpretations, acknowledge rather than choose one.
  • Citations — reference page/paragraph numbers from the source for quick verification.
저장한 Skills