인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
개발 및 엔지니어링 · SKILL.md

citlyze-prompt-audit

citlyze-prompt-audit

Audit tracked prompts in Citlyze to find weak spots and coverage gaps. Use when asked "which prompts are underperforming", "audit my tracked prompts", "where are we invisible", or "what prompts should we track next". Requires the Citlyze MCP server.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: citlyze-prompt-audit description: Audit tracked prompts in Citlyze to find weak spots and coverage gaps. Use when asked "which prompts are underperforming", "audit my tracked prompts", "where are we invisible", or "what prompts should we track next". Requires the Citlyze MCP server. license: MIT metadata: author: Citlyze (https://www.citlyze.com)

Citlyze prompt audit

Review the prompt portfolio: find prompts where the brand is invisible, engines or locations that drag performance down, and intent gaps worth tracking next.

Prerequisites

The Citlyze MCP server must be connected (setup guide). Tools are read-only; adding or editing prompts happens in the app, not over MCP.

Workflow

  1. Inventory. Call list_prompts with active: true. Each prompt has query_id, query_text, intent, tier, topic, and prompt_group. Summarize the portfolio: counts by intent and topic.
  2. Baseline. Call get_visibility_overview for the latest completed window to know the brand's average per-engine performance.
  3. Drill into suspect prompts. For prompts the user cares about (or a sample of high-tier ones), call get_prompt_visibility with the query_id. Rows in by_engine_location break metrics down per engine and location; look for:
    • prompts with near-zero mention_rate everywhere (invisible)
    • prompts strong on one engine but absent on another (engine gap)
    • prompts that diverge sharply by location (localization gap) Read every conclusion alongside n_runs; thin run counts make weak evidence.
  4. Coverage gaps. Compare the prompt inventory against how buyers actually ask: are commercial-intent prompts ("best X for Y", "X vs Y", "X alternatives") represented for each core topic? Which competitor comparisons are missing? Which customer questions from the user's domain knowledge have no tracked prompt?
  5. Deliver:
    • Weak prompt table: prompt text, worst engine/location, mention rate, n_runs, suspected reason.
    • Suggested prompts to add (5-15), each with intent label and the reason it earns a slot. Remind the user to add them in the Citlyze app.

Interpretation rules

  • Treat intent, tier, topic, and prompt_group as the workspace's own labels; group by whatever values are present rather than assuming a fixed set.
  • Zero visibility on a prompt is not automatically bad tracking; it may be the honest baseline the user needs to see.

Learn more: Prompt results in Citlyze - citlyze.com

저장한 Skills