name: business-model-canvas
description: >
Build, evaluate, and stress-test a Business Model Canvas (Osterwalder)
across all 9 blocks. Use when designing or refreshing a business model,
auditing a canvas for gaps, exploring monetization, or aligning on the
model's assumptions.
license: MIT + Commons Clause
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: borghei
category: project-management
domain: strategy-frameworks
updated: 2026-05-27
python-tools: canvas_validator.py
tech-stack: business-model-canvas, osterwalder, strategy
Business Model Canvas
A working Business Model Canvas (BMC) — Alexander Osterwalder's 9-block
strategic management template that captures how an organization creates,
delivers, and captures value.
When to use this skill
- Designing the business model for a new product or company
- Refreshing the BMC after a strategic pivot
- Stress-testing the assumptions in an existing model
- Aligning leadership on how value flows through the business
- Comparing two or more candidate business models
- Onboarding a new exec / investor to the business
The 9 building blocks
- Customer Segments — Who do we serve? (mass market, niche, segmented, diversified, multi-sided)
- Value Propositions — What value do we deliver to each segment?
- Channels — How do we reach customers? (own, partner; direct, indirect; physical, digital)
- Customer Relationships — How do we acquire, keep, and grow each segment?
- Revenue Streams — How does the customer pay? (one-time, subscription, usage, licensing, advertising)
- Key Resources — What assets are required? (physical, intellectual, human, financial)
- Key Activities — What do we do to deliver value? (production, problem-solving, platform/network)
- Key Partnerships — Who helps us? (strategic alliances, JVs, supplier relationships)
- Cost Structure — Where do costs come from? (cost-driven vs value-driven; fixed vs variable)
Clarify First
Before building the canvas, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
Workflow
Step 1 — Draft per block
Start with Customer Segments and Value Propositions (these drive everything else).
Then fill: Channels, Customer Relationships, Revenue Streams. Then: Key Resources,
Activities, Partnerships. Finish with Cost Structure.
Step 2 — Validate the chain
For each Customer Segment, trace: Segment → Value Prop → Channel → Relationship →
Revenue. If you can't connect these, the model has a gap.
Step 3 — Stress-test assumptions
For each block, list the top 2-3 assumptions and rate (high / medium / low) on:
- Evidence (do we know this is true?)
- Riskiness (what breaks if wrong?)
- Testability (can we run a cheap experiment?)
Step 4 — Run canvas_validator.py
Audit the canvas for: empty blocks, ungrounded value-prop / segment matches,
revenue / cost imbalance, segment-channel-relationship coherence.
python3 project-management/strategy-frameworks/business-model-canvas/scripts/canvas_validator.py \
--input canvas.json --format markdown
Step 5 — Iterate
Most first drafts are wrong in interesting ways. Plan to revise 3-5 times.
Decision frameworks
Which type of business model?
| Pattern | Examples | Characteristics |
|---|
| Unbundled | Investment banking (advisor + product) | Different segments; different value props |
| Long Tail | Netflix, Amazon | Niche x volume |
| Multi-sided platform | Visa, Airbnb | Connects 2+ segments; network effects |
| Free / Freemium | Spotify, LinkedIn | One segment pays for another's free use |
| Open | Open-source + services | Free product, paid expertise/services |
Most modern SaaS = multi-sided OR freemium variant.
Cost-driven vs value-driven
| Cost-driven | Value-driven |
|---|
| Lean cost structure | Focus on premium value |
| Low-price value prop | High-value, often high-price |
| Maximum automation | High-touch service |
| Extensive outsourcing | In-house excellence |
Most companies need to pick ONE — trying both produces mediocre everything.
Common BMC anti-patterns
- Generic value proposition. "Better, faster, cheaper" — applies to anything; means nothing.
- One segment listed as "everyone." Forces commodity positioning.
- Revenue streams with no channel. How does money flow?
- Costs that don't sum to revenue model. Unit economics broken.
- Partnerships listed without specific roles. What do they actually do?
- No coherent customer journey across blocks. Segment doesn't connect to channel.
Output expectations
After using this skill, you should have:
- A populated 9-block canvas with specific (not generic) statements
- A validation report flagging gaps, ungrounded assumptions, coherence issues
- 2-3 prioritized experiments to test the riskiest assumptions
- References to other strategy skills (lean canvas for startup-stage; value-proposition-canvas for the VP block)
References
references/canvas-framework.md — the 9 blocks deep, patterns, examples
references/examples-anti-patterns.md — worked examples + common failures
Related skills
project-management/strategy-frameworks/lean-canvas — startup-stage variant
project-management/strategy-frameworks/swot-analysis — internal/external strengths-weaknesses
project-management/strategy-frameworks/porters-five-forces — competitive dynamics
project-management/discovery/value-proposition-canvas — deeper on the value-prop block
project-management/execution/north-star-metric — what to measure once model is set
business-growth/pricing-strategy — pricing depth for the revenue block
c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor — strategic context for the model