인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
생산성 및 협업 · SKILL.md

audit-training-experiment

audit-training-experiment

Audits an ML training experiment for reproducibility, evidence integrity, leakage, checkpoint identity, evaluation validity, and overclaimed conclusions. Use before accepting results, spending on a longer run, publishing artifacts, or handing work to another agent.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: audit-training-experiment description: Audits an ML training experiment for reproducibility, evidence integrity, leakage, checkpoint identity, evaluation validity, and overclaimed conclusions. Use before accepting results, spending on a longer run, publishing artifacts, or handing work to another agent.

Audit Training Experiment

Audit the claim against the preserved evidence. Do not regenerate missing evidence during the audit unless explicitly asked; identify the gap.

Reconstruct the experiment

Verify that the record contains:

  • hypothesis, acceptance and stop gates, scope, and explicit non-claims;
  • source and dataset revisions, split manifests, provenance, licenses, and hashes;
  • generator, teacher, prompt, schema, validator, tokenizer, and model revisions;
  • exact command/configuration, seed, packages, hardware, runtime, memory, and cost;
  • complete logs, checkpoint inventory, best metric and checkpoint identity;
  • raw held-out outputs, normalized outputs, per-case validation, and latency.

Confirm that preserved hashes match current artifacts. Distinguish unavailable evidence from failed evidence.

Challenge validity

Check for:

  • row or group leakage across splits;
  • labels, canonical identifiers, intent metadata, or teacher answers in prompts;
  • outcome-based case selection;
  • retries, repairs, remediation, or fallback hidden inside first-attempt metrics;
  • test-set use during prompt, corpus, or checkpoint selection;
  • evaluation of the final checkpoint while claiming the best checkpoint;
  • collapsed labels, goals, lanes, positions, or abstentions;
  • untested safety boundaries or unsupported generalization;
  • averages that hide per-lane failures;
  • loss presented as usefulness or acceptance.

Recompute inexpensive counts and hashes from preserved artifacts. Do not overwrite original reports when correcting them; create a clearly named addendum or new revision.

Deliver the verdict

List each gate as passed, failed, not run, or not applicable with an evidence path. State the narrowest defensible conclusion and the smallest concrete next fix. Preserve negative evidence and prevent incompatible runs from sharing a state file or revision label.

저장한 Skills