인터페이스는 현지화되어 있으며, Skill 소개와 설명 문서는 선택한 언어로 AI가 자동 번역합니다. 코드·명령어·경로·전문 용어는 원문을 유지하며 원작자 문서가 우선합니다.
Skills 둘러보기
개발 및 엔지니어링 · SKILL.md

weekly-review

weekly-review

Use when someone wants to run a weekly review, close open loops, audit stalled projects and commitments, get their system back to trusted, restart a lapsed review habit, or says "/cs:weekly-review". Walks David Allen's three-phase loop — GET CLEAR, GET CURRENT, GET CREATIVE — with deterministic scripts that inventory open loops, gate the checklist with name…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill 문서

GitHub

name: weekly-review description: Use when someone wants to run a weekly review, close open loops, audit stalled projects and commitments, get their system back to trusted, restart a lapsed review habit, or says "/cs:weekly-review". Walks David Allen's three-phase loop — GET CLEAR, GET CURRENT, GET CREATIVE — with deterministic scripts that inventory open loops, gate the checklist with named gaps, and score commitment health 0-100. argument-hint: "[optional: directory or notes to review]" license: MIT metadata: version: 1.0.0 build_pattern: "Path-B ritual skill — GTD weekly-review loop preserved + deterministic scanner/gate/auditor scripts added" distinct_from: "reflect (per-conversation reflection, not a recurring cadence); capture (intake that feeds the system, not the review that maintains it); project-management sprint retros (team ceremony, not a personal trusted-system audit)"

Weekly Review — GTD Loop → Trusted System

Portability: Reasoning-led skill with 3 stdlib Python scripts. No external APIs, no LLM calls in scripts. Works in Claude Code CLI and Claude.ai web. The scripts do the inventory and the gating; Claude and the user do the thinking.

What this does

A personal system is only trustworthy if it gets reviewed — David Allen calls the weekly review the critical success factor of the whole method. This skill walks the three phases in order and refuses to call the review COMPLETE while any of the five mandatory GET CURRENT steps is unaccounted for. Evidence first: scan the workspace for open loops before asking the user to recall anything, because their memory is exactly what the method says not to trust.

Phase 1 — GET CLEAR (steps 1-3)

Collect loose inputs, process every inbox to zero (clarify, don't do — anything over two minutes becomes a next action), then a mind sweep to empty the head. Start with evidence:

# Inventory open loops: unchecked checkboxes, TODO/FIXME markers, stale files
python scripts/open_loop_scanner.py --dir ~/notes --stale-days 14

Route every loop found to a list — next action, waiting-for, someday/maybe, or trash.

Phase 2 — GET CURRENT (steps 4-8, all mandatory)

Review the next-action lists (mark done, prune dead), the previous calendar (missed commitments become actions), the upcoming calendar (prepare, don't react), the waiting-for list (chase or drop), and every project for exactly one next action. Then gate honestly:

python scripts/weekly_review_gate.py --list   # show the numbered ten-step checklist
python scripts/weekly_review_gate.py --done "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8" --skip "9:no someday list yet"

The gate computes completion %, names every missing step, and exits 0 (COMPLETE) or 2 (INCOMPLETE). An unskipped missing GET CURRENT step always forces INCOMPLETE.

Phase 3 — GET CREATIVE (steps 9-10)

Review someday/maybe (activate, keep, or kill), capture new ideas while the head is clear, then audit the whole commitment portfolio:

python scripts/commitment_auditor.py --input commitments.json

Flags STALLED / NO-NEXT-ACTION / SOMEDAY-CANDIDATE, prints the health formula with the score, and issues HEALTHY / DRIFTING / OVERCOMMITTED. End the review with one named next action.

Scripts

ScriptRole
scripts/open_loop_scanner.pyInventories unchecked checkboxes, TODO/FIXME markers, and stale files across a directory; grouped counts + per-file locations; --json.
scripts/weekly_review_gate.pyThe ten-step three-phase checklist; --done/--skip/--list; completion % + named gaps → COMPLETE (exit 0) / INCOMPLETE (exit 2).
scripts/commitment_auditor.pyFlags stalled and actionless commitments, computes the 0-100 health score with the formula shown → HEALTHY / DRIFTING / OVERCOMMITTED.

References

Assets

Rules

  • All five GET CURRENT steps are mandatory; skip only with a stated reason, and the gate still names it.
  • Never self-certify — the gate issues the verdict; relay its exit code, don't soften it.
  • Process, don't do: during the review, anything over two minutes becomes a next action, not a detour.
  • Timebox 60-90 minutes; past two hours, gate what's done honestly and schedule the remainder.
  • A lapsed habit restarts with a shorter pass and zero guilt — a review is maintenance, not judgment.

Distinct From (don't reach for the wrong sibling)

  • productivity/reflect — reflects on one conversation or piece of work, once. The weekly review is a recurring cadence over the whole system.
  • productivity/capture — the intake funnel (brain dump → actions). Capture feeds the system; this review keeps it trusted.
  • project-management sprint retros — a team ceremony about a shared iteration. This is a personal trusted-system audit.

Version: 1.0.0 · Build pattern: Path-B ritual skill — GTD weekly-review loop preserved + deterministic gate/scanner/auditor scripts added.

저장한 Skills